Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrio Canlubang (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Canlubang. T. Canens (talk) 23:16, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Barrio Canlubang
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. hueman1 (talk)  10:22, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep : Topic satisfies WP:GEOLAND. David. moreno 72    11:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect As far as I can tell this is a duplicate of Canlubang, and should be redirected there.Pontificalibus 05:35, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Canlubang - not notable enough for a stand alone article - no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" per WP:GNG - Epinoia (talk) 02:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect. The single keep !votes here points to WP:GEOLAND as the only justification for this article's subject's notability. As a "barrio", which is not a legally recognized administrative subdivision in the Philippines, Barrio Canlubang falls under the "populated places without legal recognition" category which means we should evaluate this under WP:GNG, which it fails to meet. —seav (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.