Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrow Indoor Market


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect (already merged). Sr13 07:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Barrow Indoor Market

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable location Kijog 15:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Neutral. "one of the largest Markets in Cumbria" sounds notable, but its all uncited.  If it was a very new article I would say Keep, but since it's existed in this state for so long I'm not going to.  If someone was able to expand the article (or at least cite and stub it) then I would change to Keep.
 * Merge with Barrow-in-Furness per Iain99, below. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 16:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  16:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've just found out - it's basically a direct lift from, so there is a copyright issue as well. Being the largest (in the opinion of the local council) of the few markets a rural county like Cumbria has is not really notable in my opinion. I have been working on Barrow-in-Furness and it wasn't even mentioned there.Kijog 16:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've trimmed it to remove the copyvio, but now the article's so small it's in danger of vanishing. Don't really know about the notability so neutral. Iain99 21:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Barrow-in-Furness There are a some sources eg and  (and also quite a lot of tourist information sites, which are probably less relible) - not really notable enough for its own article, but probably merits a sentence or two in the town's main article. Iain99 07:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability is questionable and no reliable sourcing. Almost falls under WP:NOT. -- MarcoTolo 03:35, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Iain99 has provided two good references for the market. Not notable enough to have its own article, but warrants a line or two in the Barrow-in-Furness article, (unless you think you can make a case for it being WP:TRIVIA).  I don't see the connection to WP:NOT at all. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 09:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Since half of the article is a schedule of when the market is open, the WP:NOT #3 seems to apply: ...generally should not list upcoming events, current promotions, phone numbers, current schedules, etc.. -- MarcoTolo 21:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge into Barrow-in-Furness. the wub "?!"  09:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge - can be quite easily added to Barrow-in-Furness with a couple of refs. Don't think it merits its own article.Kijog 10:08, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - have added what info there is to main Barrow article plus refs (not opening hours).Kijog 11:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Section break
The information has been merged into Barrow-in-Furness by Kijog (see diff). We must now decide what to do with this article.


 * Redirect to Barrow-in-Furness. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 12:46, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above - they're cheap, and it will alert anyone who might want to recreate this article that the subject is already covered. Iain99 12:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.