Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Stevens (wrestler)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Soft delete - undeletion may be requested at WP:REFUND. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 14:48, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Barry Stevens (wrestler)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completing nomination on behalf of anonymous editor 68.200.222.137, who posted their rationale at WT:AFD. That rationale is reproduced below. On the merits.... honestly, looking at the references, it's hard to see a case for keeping this one. Obviously, per WP:USUAL, if Stevens finds himself on more cards (and gets more coverage as a result), an article might end up being appropriate. We're not there yet, though. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

The subject only appeared once on television and hasn't been heard from since, yet he has an article despite not being notable whatsoever. 68.200.222.137 (talk) 03:17, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per my statement above. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Nici  Vampire  Heart  14:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  Nici  Vampire  Heart  14:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete other that being fodder for establishing Ryback's persona there is nothing to else to say about him. There were also several other wrestlers that had these types of matches with Ryback so it may be a good idea to see if there are other articles for wrestlers that are only know for losing to Ryback.--70.49.80.250 (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * That's as may be, though it doesn't make this person more or less notable. But if you have a list of these, post them at the discussion on WT:AFD and we can have a look. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I was not suggesting that the issue I mentioned would affect this person's notability but simply suggesting that there may be other atticles out there that may require deletion.--70.49.80.250 (talk) 06:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't have a list myself so that was why I was brought it up so someone more knowledgable than myself could look into it.--70.49.80.250 (talk) 06:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:18, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:44, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 12:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)




 * Comment - The third extension is supposed to include a detailed rationale of why the debate is being extended rather than a decision made. Carrite (talk) 18:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.