Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bart B More


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:17, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Bart B More

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable music producer. Google search reveals plenty of vanity hits and publicity, and this article, but no independent coverage.

Draft was declined twice in AFC before being copied to mainspace. Copying a draft to mainspace is permitted, but only if it belongs in mainspace. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:21, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I don't really get the 'but no independent coverage' part. I added quite some (in my opinion independent) references to the page, hoping this would be sufficient. I could even add more, but I'm kind of lost whether the references that I'm adding are 'independent' enough based on your remark? --Konayt (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , some of your sources pass the independence criteria, but fail on providing "significant coverage". For example, Billboard, Dancing Astronaut and The Liverpool Echo are respected and reliable sources, but all their articles do is mention Bart B. More's name, nothing else. The Dutch DJ Guide site has a more in-depth interview, but won't be considered a reliable source as it is not a professional journalistic site with editorial control, but what appears to be a profit-making business running dance events. So what we are looking for is significant coverage from a respected magazine or news website. Richard3120 (talk) 14:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the explanation! I see what you mean... I do find quite some interviews on google, but probably those are not within the standards. I did add some more references just now, but even on them I'm not sure anymore.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - producers are dime a dozen. I tried to click on a few possibly good sources (BBC) and found nothing indicating significant coverage, other than a stray interview. Bearian (talk) 17:25, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  02:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the moment, it fails the notability test, as per the lack of significant coverage. Caballero / Historiador⎌ 16:20, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete.I feel that the topic fails notability test because the coverage is very less and the sources are not authenticVinodbasker (talk) 17:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)*


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.