Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BaseBean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

BaseBean

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. It appears to be the name used for a specific example in a single book. There is no well-defined term in current use, and the article as-written doesn't describe an important term in Computer Science. Power~enwiki (talk) 19:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – appears to be a protologism with very little usage, as seen from Google ngrams. Fails the GNG. —  Quasar   G.  19:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- unsourced original research, unless this all comes from a Dummies book, which are often user-submitted content / non RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.