Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Base 120


 * This article was on Vfd sometime in the past and no consensus was reached. The Vfd was not removed and nobody bothered the article. I put it back on Vfd and there should be a consensus this time after at least 10 voters. 66.245.3.165 16:31, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Keep. I was interested in it. Mark Richards 17:28, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Moved discussion off of main VfD page to this subpage. -- WOT 18:00, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete, unless this base has historical significance (like Base 60) or current application (like Base 16). -- WOT 18:03, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. As is, it's non-notable. Salasks 19:25, Aug 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - just another base numbers system. Nothing further in the article. -  T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  20:49, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: original research. It is interesting, but the base-120 system doesn't appear to be used by anyone, past or present. Wile E. Heresiarch 21:18, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, no mention of why this base is usefull/notable. --Starx 02:29, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing notable about this base. DS 02:37, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. The number 120 is interesting, but base 120 isn't. sjorford 11:48, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. No more notable than it was in March, and the mere thought of having to learn the names of 119 digits gives me the shivers. Denni &#9775; 00:25, 2004 Aug 7 (UTC)