Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basil von Burman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 21:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Basil von Burman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A biography of a priest. Doesn't seem to pass WP:N. He was a deacon, but (correct me if I am wrong) this does not make one as notable as a bishop or such. Seems to have written a book or two, but bibliographical information is not very well presented, and I have concerns he would pass WP:AUTHOR. One ref is an obituary, two elinks are not even described, and are not in English (not a problem per se, but I cannot verify they even mention him). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:32, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme ( talk )  00:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Comment. If I'm reading the article correctly, the subject was a deacon, which is a lower level in the hierarchy than a priest -- he did not become a priest. See Holy orders. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:44, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:26, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | converse _ 17:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)


 * delete I'm just not seeing the claim for notability in this. Deacon is a pretty minor position. Mangoe (talk) 20:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure deletion is justified. It does need more specific sources. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment -- he might be notable as an author/translator, but I am not qualified to judge. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn't seem like he was enough of a notable author, and since he's dead, that's not going to change any time soon. Ducknish (talk) 22:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.