Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basinenipalli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - No valid reason for deletion, Just because an article is in a shit state and is unsourced doesn't really mean it should be nominated, WP:BEFORE hasn't been followed in the slightest as I in 5 seconds found so I'd imagine there's more and better sources under its Indian name. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 18:22, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Basinenipalli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability (no references whatsoever in fact); article needs significant clean up to meet WP quality standards. Rambunctious Racoon (talk) 13:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Deletion is not cleanup. As a named, inhabited place, this satisfies WP:GEOLAND. This one is larger than the last Indian village that came to AFD, and gets more frequent mention in news reports and other works. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Does appear to exist and all settlements are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Philg88 ♦talk 16:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.