Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baskent Knights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Baskent Knights

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Neither Baskent Knights nor the Turkish College National Championship games of 2006 have any significant coverage. I could not find any source to suggest that the games even happened. There are a lot of Youtube videos but those can't be added here. There are some Turkish pages so this might be a good article for Turkish Wikipedia but not for the English one. The one book I did find (and referenced) is published by the University this team belongs to. Wikishagnik (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ORG as well as WP:GNG (WP:NSPORTS doesn't apply as it doesn't mention criteria for sports organizations, despite there being a header "Organizations and games notability"). SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 18:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG with no significant coverage in multiple, independent sources.—Bagumba (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG.  I spent 30 minutes reviewing Google results, and found old YouTube videos, lots of articles derived from this Wikipedia article or mirror sites of it, and what appear to be Turkish language blogs.  I found nothing that appears to be a meaningful and reliable secondary source per WP:RS.  I also note that the only source currently cited for the article appears to be a publication that has compiled Wikipedia articles for resale.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 02:39, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.