Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basketball statistics software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Basketball statistics software

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article lacks any content NeuGye (talk) 05:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (A1: How steak is done!) — There is content, but no context. MuZemike  ( talk ) 07:14, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagged as (A1) Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Not speedy The context is obvious--the article is about baseball statistics software. There is no meaningful content at the moment, so its just a dicdef, but it could very easily be expanded, so I would not even delete it. DGG (talk) 22:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I think the article has limited potential. Even with expansion it would most likely end up in a merger discussion. It does not seem focused on any note worthy software itself. Software for basketball statistics on its own does not seem to merit its own article. This is like an article that only mentions the fact that baseball video games exist. Or that software exists to design a home. It would need great expansion, followed by defending not being merged in order to hold up as an article. Based on the subject content presented this does not seem likely to happen. NeuGye (talk) 04:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable software. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 21:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.