Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basler Turbo BT-67


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Basler BT-67. Spartaz Humbug! 07:45, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Basler Turbo BT-67

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Well in fact merge with c-47, there is not enough here to warrant its own article. Slatersteven (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

It's not already C-47 given massive modifications - powerplant/fuselage/wings/avionics etc, with its own many STC's for many versions. Rengab —Preceding undated comment added 15:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)


 * REdirect -- This article was formerly a redirect to Basler BT-67 and the redirect should be restored. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:03, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Restore redirect to Basler BT-67 per Peterkingiron.—Ketil Trout (&lt;&gt;&lt;!) 20:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Restore re-direct--Petebutt (talk) 23:44, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Basler BT-67 - poor newly created fork of existing article.Icewhiz (talk) 11:18, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge into Basler BT-67 – it looks as though somebody went off turning the Basler Turbo BT-67 redirect into an article, instead of expanding the existing Basler BT-67 article. All the newly added info (assuming it's well referenced) should be merged into Basler BT-67 though, not just replaced by a redirect. --Deeday-UK (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.