Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bass management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 20:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Bass management

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is a how-to guide that seems more appropriate for a project like Wikiversity. However, how-to guides on home theaters seem like they might be off-topic for that project, too, so I'm bringing it up for discussion to see if there's a better home for this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - Notabile topic. Deleting would not serve readers. No opposition to also covering this topic elsewhere. If there are WP:HOWTO issues with the article, those should be discussed on the article's talk page. WP:NOTCLEANUP. ~Kvng (talk) 16:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It's useful and just notable, eh? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * You seem to be asserting that this is a marginally notable topic. You did not cite a notability issue in proposing this deletion so I did not address that in my original keep statement. But, here's a book search that clearly establishes notability IMO.
 * To be clear, I think it should be kept because the subject meets WP:GNG and hasn't put forward a clear or valid WP:DEL-REASON in this proposal. ~Kvng (talk) 22:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * After reading deletion reason #14 in the very page that you just linked, would you like to retract your statement that I did not include a clear and valid deletion reason? Also, I'll link you to WP:GOOGLEHITS.  Do you have a valid keep rationale, or are you just going to keep going down the list of invalid ones? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I've made my case as best as I am willing. I'll let others have their say. ~Kvng (talk) 18:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there may be a misunderstanding about the content of this article. Granted, it could do with some improvement, but it is not a how-to guide; it describes how bass management is implemented, often (but by no means always) in A/V receivers. This is about the design of the digital signal processing functions, and (in my opinion) is suitable for Wikipedia. If it would help I can volunteer to try and improve it (but not if it's about to be deleted). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawny Brown Frowny Owl (talk • contribs) 08:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. The article has many issues, with the scope mirroring Audio crossover and the content mostly consisting of WP:HOWTO, but the subject of bass reproduction in multichannel audio systems is notable with sufficient coverage existing in Google Scholar. PaulT2022 (talk) 21:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.