Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bassilyo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Bassilyo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

So confusing. I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 16:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete . Confusing indeed, but it seems fairly clear there is nothing that would count towards WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, let alone WP:ANYBIO. GregorB (talk) 18:07, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Northamerica1000 and point well taken... :-) GregorB (talk) 07:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  18:26, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – The subject passes WP:BASIC. Source examples include:, , , ,.


 * – Some of these sources were found by simply selecting the "News" link in the find sources template atop this discussion. Note that the absence of citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that the subject is not notable. Can't help to wonder if people even bother to check for sources before nominating/!voting nowadays. See also: WP:BEFORE. North America1000 07:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's a very poor article but the sources found demonstrate notability. --Michig (talk) 07:46, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination I'm convinced by the above comments and the great work done on the article. My error. Boleyn (talk) 10:27, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.