Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Chura. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Basur

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No references or sources, only one line of information, does not meet the notability guideline. RoryReloaded 09:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 17:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  18:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Chura, which is the best alternative to deletion. Google News Archive and Google Books return few results that could be used to establish independent notability. However, I have been able to find this Google Books link (see the bottom of page 182), which confirms that Basúr is a subgroup of Khatik, which is an alternative name for Chuhra. Cunard (talk) 22:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Chura as per source found by Cunard. Note that the current (unsourced) article content contradicts that source, so there is nothing to merge, i.e., it is even ok to delete before creating the redirect. A sentence can be added to the Chura article, explaining that Basur is a sub-caste. Abecedare (talk) 04:02, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.