Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bat-Kado


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Bat-Kado

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Possibly borderline A11 if it's confirmed that the "game" is created by the article creator. But in any case, there are zero hits online for this card game. CSD as A7 was declined by. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Also adding the following article to the AFD:
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. Neither card games nor fictional characters are readily covered by the speedy system; I'm chary of using A11 ("obviously invented") as lack of Google hits could conceivably be a language problem. I suggested proposed deletion to Narutolovehinata5 as these seem uncontroversial candidates for deletion, unless the original creator can improve them to show notability. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * To be frank I'm usually wary of using proposed deletion for the simple reason that all it takes to oppose it is the removal of the proposed deletion tag. From experience, about 80% of the time I tagged an article for PROD the article the article creator removes it, almost always without explanation. Which is fine and perfectly acceptable under the proposed deletion policy, but it also means in the end such articles would usually end up being AFD'd anyway. Better to just skip the PROD step and go straight to AFD, at least actual discussion is possible. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Adding this to the AFD:


 * Delete, no evidence of notability as nominator says. RA 0808  talkcontribs 02:34, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing found on the web Domdeparis (talk) 17:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.