Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bataar Enkhjargal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 14:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Bataar Enkhjargal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Could not find any references to this person that aren't derived from the WP article, no references on mongolian language pages either. Not sure if dying in a minor military incident grants him sufficient notability. The misspelled "baatar" means "hero", which may be a name or also just a description. The only link to this page used to be in Battle of Khalkhyn Temple for a while, and has since been removed. I propose to delete for lack of reliable sources. Kind of a pity looking at the rather specific biographic details given, but I see no way to verify his significance. Latebird (talk) 12:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  12:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  12:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - lacks "significant coverage" per WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 10:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 01:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:MILPEOPLE as a proven extension to WP:GNG on top of the usual standard search evaluations. #5 of MILPEOPLE does discuss "significant military events", but the sole source on the "event" mentioned can be found here and does not even link back to the person in this article. Not talking very high in the historical record, one could say. Moreover, the biography currently has zero citations whatsoever which can be grounds for deletion on its own if requested. Lastly, this is also an orphan article, furthering the argument for general lack of notability (though not itself an automatic flag for deletion). ♪ Tstorm(talk) 10:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.