Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batang Tiga Police Station Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. For the record, a museum is absolutely an organization and covered by WP:ORG S warm   we ♥ our hive  06:09, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Batang Tiga Police Station Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. no evidence of significant coverage for this tiny gallery LibStar (talk) 15:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 00:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 00:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment. ORG is irrelevant. A police station is a building. A museum is also a building, or at least a collection of artefacts. Neither is an organisation. James500 (talk) 11:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * fails WP:GNG regardless. You certainly like gaming the system and avoiding the most obvious way to establish notability through demonstrating sources. Instead long winded obfuscating is the way. LibStar (talk) 15:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You know perfectly well that I was not arguing that the topic is notable. I was merely pointing out that an argument you advanced was irrelevant, in order to prevent you from confusing others. James500 (talk) 19:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

let's see if you can't resist with another response. LibStar (talk) 06:09, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Regardless of if WP:ORG applies or WP:GEOFEAT applies (as to buildings), I can't find any other secondary source references to this museum. The single one in the article isn't enough. If there are references in Malay that I can't find because I don't speak Malay, then those need to be brought up here. Otherwise, the article should be deleted. I would also remind LibStar to focus on issues and assume good faith (which the above comment does not do). agt x  17:38, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete no secondary sources to establish notability.Pincrete (talk) 13:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.