Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batchsync


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Would have been a valid speedy delete as a substantial recreation of the article deleted at Articles_for_deletion/BatchSync. Sjakkalle (Check!)  19:39, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Batchsync

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A previous article instance by the same WP:SPA contributor was deleted at AfD in October 2018. A PROD was added to this new (differently-spelled) instance by with the rationale "Recreation of deleted article by same corporate WP:SPA" but is ineligible because of the 2018 decision, hence this new AfD. This instance does feature a review on a Softpedia download page which perhaps may make it ineligible for CSD G4. However neither that nor anything else seems sufficient to change my delete opinion in the previous AfD, repeated in this rationale: "A WP:SPA-maintained article describing a product's features. My searches are not finding the independent WP:RS coverage needed for notability by WP:PRODUCT / WP:GNG.". AllyD (talk) 08:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Recently created and already has been tagged for notability. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 11:46, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete As per nom. Seems like a procedural issue and the authorWP:GAMING the system by using a different spelling. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.