Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batista and Rey Mysterio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Batista_and_Rey_Mysterio

 * — (View AfD)

A three week tag team doesn't deserve an article. They never wanted to be a significant team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mshake3 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep As per previous AfD at Articles for deletion/Rated RKO, all WWE Tag Team Champions are notable -- RoninBK E TC 20:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: That team has its own name and is currently running... this team went unamed for the three weeks they performed together --- Paulley


 * Keep Notable enough, even if you ignore the fact they held belts. DavyJonesLocker 21:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Per above. -- Mikedk9109  (hit me up)  21:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, and perhaps a speedy close Very obviously, this tag team is notable. Even if they were together for five minutes, they would be notable if they were the champions for four minutes. -- Kicking222 22:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * comment:Can i ask why would they be notable if they were together for five minutes
 * Keep If this was a 3 day WWE tag team, they would be notable. --Oakshade 23:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Would you all say that an article about Eddie Guerrero and Tajiri is worth creating? 12.206.114.132 03:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep only because they won the belts, otherwise I would say Delete. DS9 Voyager 05:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete All the information will be in their own profiles. Also the fact there is hardly any information on that page. I feel it doesn't need to be kept. Govvy 13:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and put blurbs on each wrestler's page, if it ain't there already. No, not all tag-teams are notable.  Especially not tag teams that don't have a name other than the two wrestler's names themselves. -- Grev 09:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete they had three matches together and the one week title run was to promote a single match at a PPV... hardly notable whatsoever esspecially as their tag team career can be descibed with one paragraph on each wrestlers article --- Paulley
 * On a more wikipedia note... there is infact only one article that links to this page --- Paulley 17:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing notable about the tag team.«»bd(talk stalk) 17:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Short lived teams (even if they held the title) aren't notable. Relevant information belongs in Batista and Rey Mysterio articles only. Stop with the tag team cruft already. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a guide to every WWE tag team ever. RobJ1981 18:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not a real team, was only around for a bit, the tag team landscape has changed so much that there are plenty of these thrown around teams together, and there should not be an article, just merge info to the separate wrestler's pages. Booshakla 02:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Information belongs in the pages of the individual wrestlers. -- Aaru Bui  DII 15:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This has nothing to do with them not having their own names, but they were never a real tag team, as their gimmicks were as separated when they did team together as when they didn't. Key hint of this: they teamed together like this while Batista was the World Heavyweight Champion. 172.149.224.143 23:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.