Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman: Caped Crusader


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. No need to redirect since the title is not confirmed. Tone 19:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Batman: Caped Crusader

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Falls under WP:NFF (no principal photography), but I can't find much evidence that this film is planned outside of various rumor boards. Mr. Vernon (talk) 19:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:CRYSTAL. Schuym1 (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL/WP:NFF violation. Should be redirected to Batman computer and video games as one of the games described there had a very similar title. JulesH (talk) 21:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Batman computer and video games as a plausible search term for the 1988 video game. Otherwise, article is pure crystalballery and unverifiable speculation. MuZemike 00:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure speculation and total fabrication. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  12:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree that a redirect to Batman computer and video games would be useful. the wub "?!"  12:55, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; the title and the information within the article is flat-out unverifiable. We have everything we need at Batman (film series). — Erik  (talk • contrib) 15:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NFF, and possibly WP:HOAX.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  15:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A cursory search can confirm NONE of the assertions in the article, beyond it being rumour. Cannot confirm, cast, crew, director, production... nothing. If not a hoax, it seems to come close. No need to even merge of redirect this one, as it even fails WP:Verfy.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and then redirect. This is a rare case where keeping the history intect is actively harmful as it consists of nothing but unverifiable speculation about living people.  When the project is confirmed verifiable material about it can be put at Batman (film series) and it can be spun out as a seperate article when appropriate (about the time that principal photography begins).  However, this is a plauible misnomer for a video game and so a redirect to Batman computer and video games makes sense.  Eluchil404 (talk) 01:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.