Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batman on Film


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Batman on Film
vanity, advertising Calm 18:42, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, advertising. LordViD 18:53, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy as above. 23skidoo 20:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Verify - if it is really the longest running website of its kind, then it might be sufficiently notable. Note Alexa ranking of 130,000, which is a fair bit behind the 10,000 qualification.  Its going to have to go with uniqueness to make it.  But as it is a 1998 web site, it doesn't qualify for speedy for vanity. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 21:35, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh and their 2,120 forum members is a bit behind the 5,000 recommendation.  I still think its worth checking out though.  Should go through the 1 week process at a minimum. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 21:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I am very heavily leaning towards keep here, but am too tired to research it enough to say for sure. Would like some more investigation thanks. Zordrac  (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 21:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete- flunks notability. Reyk 22:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete- as per the wonderful reasoning of the deletionists above. Croat Canuck 02:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Zordrac. Stifle 00:24, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.