Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battaglia's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:59, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Battaglia's

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Lack of independent in-depth coverage in RS. Sources are primary or routine minor coverage. A WP:MILL local business. MB 02:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  02:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  Kpg  jhp  jm  02:26, 3 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete as non notable. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 18:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Smallbones( smalltalk ) 03:10, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Independent locally-owned grocery stores could clear the wikinotability bar if they were reliably sourced well enough to clear WP:CORPDEPTH, but they are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist — but the sourcing here consists of two community hyperlocals and three primary sources that do not constitute support for notability at all, not CORPDEPTH-passing coverage in major media. Bearcat (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP and GNG.  HighKing++ 16:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.