Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle Cry of Freedom (Game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  05:26, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Battle Cry of Freedom (Game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )


 * Does not appear to meet notability requirement for inclusion in Wikipedia (WP:GNG)
 * Is about a future publication which does not appear to have any google hits other than self-published (WP:CRYSTAL) Baldy Bill  ( sharpen the razor &#124; see my reflection ) 15:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. If/when it gets made, I can guarantee that my father will want to play it, but as far as this article goes there is nothing to use to show that it passes notability guidelines. There are primary sources announcing the company's intentions to make the game and a little blog and forum chatter, but nothing to show that this would pass notability guidelines at this point in time. If/when RS comes available, I have no problem with it being recreated. It's just that at this point in time there's nothing out there to show it's notable yet.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   16:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello. What would this article need for it to be notable to be here? Okofo 19:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Reply Hi Okofo, please click on the WP:GNG ←link and see the criteria applied to all articles, which should always be checked when deciding to create any article, this will help avoid the irritation of seeing your work listed on a deletion discussion. The article itself is not the problem, it's the subject. My suggestion is that you copy the content of your article onto a word processor file on your computer and save it for future reference; once the game receives "significant coverage" in an independent website or magazine (not a blog site or developer's own website) then would be a good time to recreate the article. Tokyogirl79 above explains the problem well. Baldy Bill  ( sharpen the razor &#124; see my reflection ) 23:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 02:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.