Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle for Donetsk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Battle for Donetsk

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The article is about a non-notable browser and mobile game created in 2015 which was highlighted in Russian sources like Sputnik and RT, along with an International Business Times article , all of which are blacklisted per WP:RSP (in ways they weren't back in 2015). A Ukranian-language DW article is just a straight interview with the developers and a small Popular Science blog post about it  exists too -- neither are enough to pass full muster at WP:N in my opinion (although I could see an argument to keep if more sources were found).

There was no coverage in anything from WP:VG/RS (actually no hits, which is surprisingly rare), no newspaper coverage, and nothing in Google Books. Nomader ( talk ) 07:54, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Ukraine.  Nomader  ( talk ) 07:54, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:36, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete I could not find a single quality source. Clearly non-notable. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.