Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Devarakonda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Probably not a hoax, but no clear evidence of notability. —Ganesha811 (talk) 19:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Devarakonda

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Couldn't find a single reliable source mentioning a battle called the "Battle of Devarkonda." This makes it clear that the article is fabricated. It was created and modified by socks who were disrupting articles related to Indian military conflicts. The article lacks notability, and no sources cover this conflict in detail or refer to it as the "Battle of Devarkonda." Created by socks/continuous disruptors for self pleasure. Imperial [AFCND]  09:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military,  and India.  Imperial  [AFCND]  09:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * comment- The repeated mentioning of "Muslim" in the lead itself is enough to identify the the target of the creator (ofcourse, the user is blocked). Imperial [AFCND]  09:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 09:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced. — Alien333 (what I did &amp; why I did it wrong) 10:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Being unsourced is a not a reason for deletion because it can be fixed through editing. In this case, however, notability does not appear to be established.  C F A   💬  15:59, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't think this is a hoax. It is briefly mentioned in some pages online, like this blog/article. Regardless, it certainly doesn't meet WP:NMIL with this little coverage.  C F A   💬  15:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * @Clearfrienda We have seen numerous unreliable sources that discuss rewritten and inaccurate history, often contradicting well-established sources. I do not consider those blogs and write-ups to be credible, especially since such biased South Asian blogs are widely available online. The site linked above itself contains praise and many biased writings. Imperial  [AFCND]  16:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Source by Dr. M.A. Haque, lecturer in history, Regional college of Education, Bhubaneswar, Orissa on page 33 talks about the battle at Devarakonda. Page needs to be fixed with background where Bahamanis sieged Devarakonda. More reliable sources will be helpful. 2 other sources, I was not able to verify. RangersRus (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak delete for notability. The first source is a paper book that I cannot access online. The second ref (Subrahmanyam 1957) links back to the article. The third source, a book from 1980, looks legitimate but only mentions the battle on one page (which you can access by entering "Devarakonda" into the search function provided). So we have enough accessible sources to show that the battle took place and a few basics about who fought and who won. I say draftify if even one person volunteers to make improvements. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. There seem to be insufficient sources that discuss this battle. Whizkin (talk) 14:12, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.