Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Doma Castle (Final Fantasy VI)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect. Redirects are cheap. Sr13 08:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Doma Castle (Final Fantasy VI)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is a non-notable fictional plot point written in-universe. The point is already covered encyclopedically in Final Fantasy VI, Characters of Final Fantasy VI, and World of Final Fantasy VI. Kariteh 08:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Final Fantasy VI, since it's just a snippet of plot from that game. AFD isn't needed for that. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 08:58, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect&mdash;simple solution. &mdash; Deckiller 11:13, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd go so far as to say it should be a Speedy Redirect, if there is such a thing. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 11:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect as above. I see no possibility of enough out-of-universe information on this relatively minor plot point to meet the notability guideline for fiction. Anomie 13:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect. Yeah, I like that term too. Realkyhick 17:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect speedily. &mdash; Blue. 18:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, there is nothing to merge and it's a poor redirect besides. Axem Titanium 19:28, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Poison it. Pointlessly overdetailed summary of a minor plot point in a video game with a OR name. Those "Battle of..." articles are getting ridiculous. ' 19:42, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of out-of-universe information, unlikely search term.  17Drew 01:32, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect with Utmost Haste. If anyone is searching for it, they're going to hit FFVI eventually anyway.Ravenmasterq 06:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.