Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Gdeszyn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  02:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Gdeszyn

 * – ( View AfD View log |)

Poorly referenced, only one source says that such a "battle" existed and moreover the source is completely biased for the Ukrainian side. No polish sources or books talk about such a Battle of Gdeszyn. Fajowy (talk) 13:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC) reply
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 12:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Military, Poland,  and Ukraine. TheNuggeteer (talk) 13:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I support this article is based on one sentence from Volodymyr Viatrovich's book which talks about this battle and nothing more and he is considered even for pseudo-historic AleszJaTuTylkoSprzątam (talk) 13:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete the source is WP:PRIMARY and also it didn't say anything about a battle, but about such minor clash: On 14.4.44, in the village of Dedeshin, two Ukrainian self-defence riflemen were killed in an ambush by 7 Polish robbers.Marcelus (talk) 11:44, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * true, but the fight itself is taken from only one book and that is from a pseudo-historical one Historyk.ok (talk) 15:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify. Interesting topic but needs independent sources to establish notability and verify facts. Right now this seems sourced significantly to old wartime reports and documents (WP:PRIMARY? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Draftify. A single source, a primary too, is insufficient to establish the notability of the event.- Altenmann >talk 22:03, 13 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.