Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Hollow Bastion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  19:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Hollow Bastion

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This does not seam to meet the criteria for WP:FICT; not notable, no real-world connection, looks like fancruft. Also the article was started by a user with a number of vandalism warnings - article maybe a hoax.--Bryson 21:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think the articles should be kept. 217.21.232.36 08:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I suspect a stock puppet, the user has made only a few edits.--Bryson 16:02, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is crufty as heck.  Unsourced, probably OR, and not significant enough for it's own article.  Put any needed info into Hollow Bastion or Kingdom Hearts II and axe this.  --UsaSatsui 10:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is not a hoax! Du you know how mush time it took to create the article. If you think you can make if better, do it.
 * Note. User:Killerman2 made the above vote, . --Bryson 14:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NOT a plot summary. As a Kingdom Hearts editor, I apologize immensely. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 13:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, it should be stated that this "battle" isn't really considered as such in the game itself. It's just a lot of stuff happening in a short period, that's all. I suppose ya could file this under WP:NOR, considering. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 13:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Apostrophe. Mango juice talk 15:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This is exactly the same subject as War of a Thousand Heartless, which was deleted in an AfD, and created by the same user. "War of a Thousand Heartless" was also recreated once. It's evident that this user does not understand the concept of "no" and I would consider this disruption. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 18:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Information is not significant enough and really, this article is full of irrelevent facts and very in-universe. No offence meant to the writer but this article is fancrufty and full of spelling mistakes. Yuanchosaan 05:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Question. Is the name of this article official? Yuanchosaan 05:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * As I've said above, no. The author hamfistedly tries to apply the conditions of military battle to what amounts as a "Heartless" slaughter and a bunch of other events in the same time frame. '  (Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!) 09:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.