Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Kolhapur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Keep - Proceural close - "No sources" isn't a valid reason for deletion, Clearly WP:BEFORE hasn't been followed. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 21:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Kolhapur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of sources FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 1.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems to have occurred, ergo is probably notable. We can't expect as many sources for such battles as we would have for battles involving Western European or North American countries. There seems to be some misapprehension that only online sources are valid, which is certainly not true. -- Necrothesp (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep -- The article gives two sources. My guess is that reliable primary sources lie behind these.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per invalid deletion rationale, "it's unsourced" is not a reason to delete a page about a notable subject, that's why we have WP:BEFORE. Cavarrone 12:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.