Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Mangal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Battle of Mangal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

All WP:RAJ era sources (apart from Sharma). Nishant Shashikant Sharma's work was published the International Journal of Research which has been deprecated as a predatory publisher as per here- Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 20:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  21:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military,  and Pakistan. Skynxnex (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep There are many sources on Google and some are in Hari Singh Nalwa. --Ameen Akbar (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * None of the sources in the page Hari Singh Nalwa pertaining to this battle are reliable. Could you list specific sources which meet Wikipedia's standards for reliability rather than referring to nebulous sources on Google? Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The sources in Hari Singh Nalwa are Sharma's IJR source which cannot be used on Wikipedia, a source published by the Sikh Missionary College-, an organization judging by its nomenclature and website meant only to propagate the Sikh religion; by no means is this a salient educational institution nor has it published any peer reviewed books or journals. The last source is a Google snapshot-, again from a organization that publishes hagiographies as opposed to rigorous scholarly works. The book cannot even be found anywhere on the Internet apart from that Google snippet. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 22:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.