Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Monte Cristi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No support for this proposal. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Battle of Monte Cristi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't cite any sources. So doesn't meet with WP:GNG. ||  O rbit   W harf  18:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  ||   O rbit   W harf  18:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Nominator did not perform a WP:BEFORE search. The Spanish Wikipedia article has some good sources, and there seem to be a few offline sources. Curbon7 (talk) 04:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 04:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per Curbon7 above. Article needs development, not deletion. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per Curbon7. The Febres-Cordero Carrillo article is very good, with particularly sustained coverage of the event. My Spanish is poor, but Juan Bosch's La Guerra de la Restauración appears to take note of its significance, and especially its aftermath, c. page 186. Others are available, but those require some care to translate to make sure they are not referring to a c 1863 Monte Cristi event. Urve (talk) 10:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, which seems obvious after a glance at the Spanish-language version. I hope the nom understands that lack of current sources in the article isn't sufficient grounds for an AfD. --Lockley (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously, per the above. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep -- No valid deletion ground given. The test is verifiability, not being verified by references.  This is not a BLP case.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.