Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Tashkent (713)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. G5 Courcelles (talk) 20:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Tashkent (713)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Yet another Turkic-related battle article created by a new user and which suffers from the same WP:RS and WP:VER issues. Lev Gumilevs book mentions nothing about this event on page 374. Article looks WP:OR to me. HistoryofIran (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Delete : As per the above rationale. ---Wikaviani  (talk) (contribs)  02:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as more tiresome made-up battlebollox. We already have detailed coverage of the verifiable events at Qutayba ibn Muslim and Muslim conquest of Transoxiana. This is a fanciful content fork. Mccapra (talk) 07:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. There is zero ability to verify the alleged sources on the page as they are poor citations. It is noted in the infobox that the result of the battle was Not clear (no sources available to verify). If there are no sources to determine important information of a battle then such a page isn't warranted. ElderZamzam (talk) 10:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Okoslavia (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete incomplete, unverifiable sources, no reason to keep. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.