Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Titans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Battle of Titans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Apparently fails WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:DEMOLISH. Updated to include references and citations. User:Adaminblack 13:36, 11 February 2018 (EST)
 * Considering WP:DRAFTS exist, that isn't really much of a viable argument. Either way, the argument is that no matter how "built up" it is, it will still fail WP:GNG.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:45, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Reasonable point ZXCVBNM, probably should have used WP:CHANCE. Game is barely a month of open-beta now, hasn't even seen full release in the entire EU yet, no US release expected for several updates. Working to source and provide appropriate refs as-available now. Would appreciate protips. User:Adaminblack 16:54 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep Concur with User:Adaminblack. The article's under development. User:HopsonRoad 19:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Couldn't find anything from the WP:VG/RS google search (here: ). Most mentions just refer to the phrase. The sources added to the article do not meet WP:RS-- one is the Facebook page of the game, and the other main source, "Mech Spectrum", is just a Wordpress blog and has no editorial policy on its website. Looks like an interesting concept but it just isn't notable yet. Nomader (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Apptime might not be in English, but that's not required? Looks like the page could link to a better location in the website, though: here seems better. User:Adaminblack 04:39, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Looking at a Google Translate version of the article that's already in the Wikipedia page and the staff page you linked here, it looks like that it might not have been written by a staff member but instead by a normal user (linked here)? There also isn't any sort of editorial policy other than the fact that there are staff members, so it's of questionable reliability. Unfortunately, you really need more than one really reliable source to establish that an article meets WP:GNG, so I still am keeping my delete !vote. Nomader (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  Ivec os  (t) 19:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  Ivec os  (t) 19:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - lack of third party reliable sources that cover the subject in detail - fails the WP:GNG. I also don't buy into the "DEMOLISH" defense - quite the opposite, its a rather bad sign if the game has been out for a month already and hasn't seen any coverage in the form of previews or reviews. I don't see any particular reason to believe they're coming any time soon. Sergecross73   msg me  19:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG (WP:VGSCOPE specifically) in its current state. If sources and coverage magically appear then this could be revisted, but right now it's not notable and nothing more than a WP:GAMEGUIDE. ZettaComposer (talk) 12:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 06:49, 23 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.