Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Voznesensk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Battle of Voznesensk

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

If Battle of Voznesensk (1920) is notable, it needs its article. Otherwise, a hatnote leading to Voznesensk (or any other article that mentions it) does the job. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 22:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I created this disambiguation page so that the redirect "Battle of Voznesensk" resulting after I moved Battle of Voznesensk (2022) to its current title made sense. I'm pretty sure if I had RfDed that redirect the result would have been to make a disambiguation page or just do anything possible like giving it a new inappropriate target to avoid deleting it. Wikipedia's bureaucratic processes love confusing editors and contradicting each other. Super   Ψ   Dro  13:19, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete – this page was improperly moved because apparently there was another Battle of Voznesensk in 1920. However, the article Battle of Voznesensk (1920) does not exist on the English Wikipedia. Unless such an article is created, Battle of Voznesensk (2022) is unnecessarily disambiguated, and this disambiguation page is preventing that page from being moved back to its original title. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This is pure nonsense. There was another battle in Voznesensk and it can get an article. Thus the disambiguation in the title for the newest one is necessary. Simple. We can't completely ignore events everywhere in this website just because their link is not blue yet. Super   Ψ   Dro  14:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid you're misunderstanding the purpose of disambiguation pages, which is to serve as a directory of actual, bluelinked articles in order to avoid confusion. Since there is not even an article for the 1920 battle, there is no confusion. Per WP:DABSTYLE: Each bulleted entry should have a navigable (blue) link, normally as the entry itself (see the previous bullet), or in the description if the entry is red-linked or unlinked. Please familiarize yourself with these guidelines before calling other editors' comments . InfiniteNexus (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not opposed to this disambiguation page getting deleted. What I am opposed is to removing the year from the 2022 battle's title when there was another battle in the city a century ago. Your earlier comment seemed to suggest that. Super   Ψ   Dro  15:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
 * That's exactly what I'm suggesting. Articles only need to be disambiguated if there is another existing article with the same title. This is not the case here. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:30, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete since it's an unnecessary disambiguation, though if the redlinked Battle of Voznesensk (1920) is significant enough to have its own article, that would obviously change. Sleddog116 (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.