Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the Year: The Dream Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 22:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Battle of the Year: The Dream Team

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I removed the PROD for this after finding some sources, but I'm not entirely certain that the coverage is enough to show that it passes WP:NFF at this specific point in time. I was going to just redirect it, but the coverage is just enough to where someone might make the argument that there's enough to show that it passes notability guidelines in that filming has commenced, a trailer has been released, and a release date has been given. I'm fairly neutral, although I'll say that if the consensus is to delete, a copy of this should definitely be incubated or the history left for the redirect. I wanted to bring this here to get more of a consensus. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79  (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:39, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete As original PRODer. No prejudice whatsoever to incubating and preserving the work done sourcing this; certainly looks like it will at least meet WP:GNG. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Userfy back to author for continued work as this project nears its release date, or Incubate for collaborative editing out of mainspace. If this were scheduled to be release next month, the existing coverage might merit it being an exception to WP:NFF... but as that date is nine moths away we can wait.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:01, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:03, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep As per significant coverage. StanleyTAnderson (talk) 16:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Incubate or Userfy. There really isn't the significant coverage in reliable sources that would justify an article at this point, though it will be there closer to release. --Michig (talk) 07:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Automatic Strikeout  ( T •  C ) 02:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Userfy: back to author for continued work as this project nears its release date, or Incubate for collaborative editing out of mainspace as per Schmidt. - Ret.Prof (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I have no idea what incubate means but since this film has a firm release date and since there are plenty of sources supporting its notability, I don't see the point of userfying as it will eventually be moved back to the mainspace in the Fall. Seems to me, the article should just stay where it is. There's more sources for Dream Team when searching for it's predecessor Planet B-Boy:
 * Chris Brown Cast In ‘Planet B-Boy’ Breakdancing Film
 * Chris Brown, Josh Holloway Land On 'Planet B-Boy'
 * Josh Holloway, Laz Alonso and Chris Brown Lead 'Planet B Boy' Cast
 * Chris Brown, Josh Holloway land on 'Planet B Boy'
 * It definitely meets WP:GNG. //Gbern3 (talk) 10:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.