Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of the volcano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:39, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Battle of the volcano
Fancruft. Article is based on one scene from the movie You Only Live Twice. And it uses the infobox designed for real military conflict to boot. There's nothing here that can't be discussed in the movie article. 23skidoo 16:11, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Durova 16:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Bondcruft. --Deville (Talk) 17:15, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete A synopsis in the film article would suffice at best. This could set a precedent for articles on set-pieces in any Hollywood film.  They can all be mentioned in their respective film articles, if required at all.   (aeropagitica)   19:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't see how it's any different from the ones in the Fictional battles category. The scene is iconic and well known in film annals being replicated in subsequent films, not just a section on the novel/film page.--Mole Man 20:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Response. At first glance most of the battles in that category are military battles (either involving real or fictional military). This is not a military battle - it's spies vs. villain. 23skidoo 22:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Respone. Clearly you don't even know the subject matter, don't dabble in things you have no idea about!--4.232.222.48 22:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Please read Etiquette before making statements like that again. That's not the way to gain support for your point of view. 23skidoo 00:58, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, silly to have it's own page. There's nothing there that can't be summed up on You Only Live Twice or isn't already. There isn't even a title for this so called "battle" (it's more like a raid) so that's just made up by the author. K1Bond007 22:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:16, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not sufficiently notable to have a separate article, plus the name is neologism. Peter Grey 06:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.