Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlecam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Battlecam

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Dubious (and unsourced) claim to notability: reads more like an advert (until I cleared most of that away). Editing history reveals an IP editor (173.196.178.186) who edits almost nothing except articles about this site, it's founder and it's parent company. The edits have consisted in adding reams of PR cruft, as well as reverting the advert tag on the article. Google News brings up no mention of the company from a reliable source: it only brings up aforementioned PR cruft. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually there's an awful lot of news coverage relating to the Obama streaker incident. No mention of this in the article, so that certainly needs to change.--Shakehandsman (talk) 00:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim of notability MLA (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete; seems to fall a bit short on notability. bobrayner (talk) 09:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.