Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlefield 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete as violation of WP:CRYSTAL-- JForget 01:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Battlefield 3

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Violates WP:CRYSTAL. MrStalker talk 08:48, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly violates WP:CRYSTAL Carter | Talk to me 09:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Well, it is too early to have this article. In fact, the opening sentence itself states that the game is under speculation and it might be released in late 2008. Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. Unless reliable sources are found for this article, it should be deleted. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 11:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The only information is a publisher, EA, and that's simply because EA owns the Battlefield franchise. There's no developer listed, there's no release date. The article even says that the information is wholly speculation and is based on possible leaked sources (but does not attribute those sources). Yng  varr  11:59, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is Crystall-clear. - Rjd0060 15:23, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article has no sources but it appears to have been written based on IGN or DigitalBattle.com. It looks like James Hyde of DigitalBattle.com asked EA for comment and they said they don't comment on rumors. If the rumor is true, there will be an announcement in January 2008. The article should be deleted until it can be re-created with reliable sources. --Pixelface 23:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Violates WP:CBALL Two stripe 08:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Keb25 10:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing is official yet. When it is, then it should be recreated. Not that I doubt rumors, but rumors are not enough to substantiate a new article. - XX55XX 20:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 14:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.