Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battlestar (fictional spacecraft)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Battlestar (fictional spacecraft)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fails WP:GNG, WP:WAF, and WP:PLOT. TTN (talk) 12:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 12:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Fancruft that fails GNG. There is already Battlestar Galactica (fictional spacecraft), making this redundant, and the other battlestars are far less notable than the Galactica itself, though even that may not be notable enough for an article.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete or weak selective-merge/redirect to Battlestar Galactica (fictional spacecraft), where the concept may also be explained. But should it? The potential merge target already says in the lead all a general readerm needs to know about Battlestars, and there is one sourced sentence about Zoic Studios (production sentence) from the Battlestar article not present in the merge target (which may not need a stand-alone article itself). – sgeureka t•c 16:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. In the current state, fails GNG and I don't see sources beyond reviews of some merchandise or such. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Battlestar Galactica (fictional spacecraft). As usual, deletion of information which can be merged elsewhere benefits nobody. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.