Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bawa Bairagi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 00:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Bawa Bairagi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is awful, clearly. But the bigger problem is that its subject cannot easily be discerned. It is possible that the ostensible subject is Bairagi, which may be a backward caste according to this document (which istn't a reference for anything, given that it's a primary document). Google searches for "Bawa Bairagi" deliver nothing, nor for the other terms which are supposed synonyms (denied by the just-mentioned PDF). Note that the article was originally Bawa, which is not a redirect. In short, I cannot see evidence that this is actually a subject, though I'll gladly be proven wrong. Drmies (talk) 03:53, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Its a badly written article about a non notable subject and there is lot of original research and not backed by good sources.Uncletomwood (talk) 07:18, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be written by a newbie unfamiliar with...well, any sort of policies on anything. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.