Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bawls (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. M ercury  03:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Bawls
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of Notability. Article has previously passed an AfD for advertisin, though in my oppinion it still reads like an advertisment. Taemyr (talk) 11:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) Notability has been asserted after nomination of article. Taemyr (talk) 14:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Obviously Notable beverage, and although the previous nomination is a little wonky, the fact that the article has been around since August 2004 says a fair bit. Sources can be found, as as such I have tagged the article for Rescue. Fosnez (talk) 12:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep AfD is not cleanup. Clearly notable product. Did you actually look for sources before you went and put it up for AfD?  Whispe ring  12:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I just added three sources I'll add more tonight when I get home from work.  Whispe ring  13:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I did in fact look at the sources. And in contrast with the sources added today they did not seem to me to be independent.  Taemyr (talk) 14:02, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll work on the ad sounding parts tonight as well.  Whispe ring  14:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Referenced for the most part, notable based on sources.  spryde |  talk  13:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable nationally-sold beverage, although the article desperately needs a strong trim to remove trivia to remove unencyclopedic information (Some people save their bottles? Who cares?) Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep If an article does not match style because of some surmountable problem, it should be fixed, not proposed for deletion. -Verdatum (talk) 18:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.