Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bawri language


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Bagri language. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Bawri language

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Small scale language, not recognised by the national government of India. Could be considered non notable but not suited for CSD. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 13:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Anbu121  ( talk me ) 13:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  Anbu121  ( talk me ) 13:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

espected wikipedian bawri language is spoken by bawri sikhs.these arer considered backward accoding to Indian laws.since this community is illitrate and small thats why this language is not so common.you can find only its details articles related to Sri ganganagar district.as wikipedian it is my duty to put light on this language.later i will add more detail regarding this language.some people have told their language in indian census2012. Shemaroo (talk) 13:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep : The name appears at Ethnologue, although the article definitely needs sources and attention from an expert. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:53, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * We already have an article on the Bagri language, of which "Bawri" is an alternative name, so redirect to Bagri language. Angr (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, redirect. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect, as it would be a welcome move since it is an alternative name to Bagri language. Secret of success (talk) 16:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.