Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay Islands Voice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Bay Islands Voice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly-sourced article about a non-notable publication. The only sources that I could find were trivial mentions. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 04:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. I found some brief mentions in other newspapers, but not anything that would really establish notability. The only thing that even goes into any depth are mentions in travel books like this one, but not anything to where it'd really firmly establish notability since travel guides are considered to be somewhat routine coverage. (Meaning that if it's even remotely visible, they'll write about it or that perhaps people can petition the publishers to include them in the books.) Now I would recommend salting this since this is related to the article for Thomas Tomczyk, which has previously been deleted 7 times. Since this article goes out of its way to give a fairly large amount of information about Tomczyk (in comparison to the rest of the article) and because if the main article is salted this will likely become a new target for further re-creation, salting would hopefully deter further attempts to re-create the article or insert information about Tomczyk on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:49, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Highbeam turns up a couple of passing mentions, but I am seeing nothing to indicate this magazine and more recently webzine attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 07:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.