Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bay Pointe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Bay Pointe

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

As discussed on the talk page, the article serves little purpose as the development in question was cancelled, and had no wider architectural, planning or political significance. Pondle (talk) 11:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep clear evidence of notability in the article refs and external links. The fact that it was not built has no bearing on this. Polargeo (talk) 11:35, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I have nothing against a merge but this is certainly not a deletion issue and a merge should be discussed in the article talkpages rather than forced through by AfD. Polargeo (talk) 12:44, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merging / redirecting via an AfD is perfectly acceptable and has been done many times before.  Bettia  (talk)  12:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes true (I have !voted merge many times) but what I said is that it is not a deletion issue. I also dislike a merge forced through by AfD eagerness when the article is as well presented as this one. That is not to say I disagree with a well considered merge but in this case that can happen without AfD pressure. Polargeo (talk) 15:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete (or merge with Cardiff International Sports Village). References and "notability" aside, as per nom, the development had little significance and does not really merit its own article. Merging relevant info to the Sports Village article seems appropriate. Nouse4aname (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete and Merge - per Nouseforaname, the development was never built, so doesn't warrant its own article any more, but is still significant so a small paragraph would be appropriate on Cardiff International Sports Village. Welshleprechaun (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Seems to meet the notability guidelines, its well referenced and stands on its own two feet. Just because it is now cancelled shouldn't change that. Jeni  ( talk ) 12:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge. Not convinced a cancelled housing project has any enduring notability, but fits perfectly into the Aborted Projects section in Cardiff International Sports Village. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Cardiff International Sports Village as already suggested by Welshleprechaun and Chris. This project no longer warrants its own article, but a merge would be a good idea as this is very relevant to that section, and redirecting would work as "Bay Pointe" would be a valid search term.  Bettia  (talk)  12:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.