Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayamón FC Femenino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Puerto Rico Bayamón. czar 23:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Bayamón FC Femenino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:NCORP. Sources are primary and I am unable to locate significant coverage to satisfy the notability criteria for both organization and football club. The editor  whose username is Z0 08:56, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:20, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination, I don't see anything to help this article, fails pretty much every WP you can throw at it. Govvy (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge sports teams aren't subject to WP:NCORP but rather just WP:GNG/WP:FOOTYN. This one, at the very least, comes closer than you might think:   That being said, this may be better merged into Puerto_Rico_Bayamón, assuming they are the same organisation. SportingFlyer  talk  18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * They aren't subject to FOOTYN either, as you well know. That page is not an SNG, it is a Wikiproject football essay. The links you bring up are WP:ROUTINE coverage of a few matches, and contains next to no info about the team itself. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  05:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * As you know, WP:FOOTYN represents longstanding consensus about football club notability. Routine articles are fine for club notability IMO because they show the club is covered by the media on a consistent basis. SportingFlyer  talk  19:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The article will be improved as the team progresses through this season in the new Liga Puerto Rico. It shouldn't be merged to Puerto Rico Bayamón because both are different teams even though they are under the same club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JavierAlejandro23 (talk • contribs) 02:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 10:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability per the GNG, searches do not reveal anything better. The GNG is the only guideline that applies to sports team articles, per WP:NTEAM. WP:NCORP specifically excludes teams, and WP:FOOTYN is an essay, not an SNG. A merge to the men's club would also work. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  05:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge with Puerto Rico Bayamon until there are more sources. They are the same club, it is not a problem to cover two teams in an article. This wouldn't have come to AfD if it was a section in the larger article. Jack N. Stock (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge, because of Jacknstock.  ~SML  •  TP  13:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.