Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayonet Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to draftspace: Draft:Bayonet Records. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Bayonet Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability, only independent source in the article is a blog post. A search for sources doesn't show any coverage of this company, merely mentions albums being released by this label. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify. This label has an interesting slate of artists, some of whom are notable, though the label itself doesn't appear to meet WP:ORGCRIT at this time. KidAd  •  SPEAK  18:06, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify given the potential of significant improvement. --Yoonadue (talk) 02:40, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify per KidAd.4meter4 (talk) 02:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftify As per KidAd. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.