Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayside Shopping Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge. I'll redirect, can be mentioned in Frankston, Victoria if anyone's interested. W.marsh 17:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Bayside Shopping Centre
Non-notable location, and does not provide any credible sources proving that it meets WP:CORP. Previous attempts at speedy-delete and prod were unsuccessful. Also, it's worth noting that the account that created this article, has been creating multiple "non-notable shopping center" articles. Elonka 21:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and Discipline Tuddy - The article is NN per here as Elonka mentioned. I propose the ban based on the user's childish edits (scroll down a bit/NSFW) and refusal to learn Wikipedia's policies. - b o b b y  22:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable store, and discipline this user already...  Dooms Day  349     Happy Halloween!  23:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be a non-notable mall. TJ Spyke 23:32, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Frankston, Victoria per WP:LOCAL, a significant place within the community that is already mentioned in passing with the article. I'll drop a message on the creator's talk page regarding his patterns of article creation.  JYolkowski // talk 23:15, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Frankston. While there are sources about this shopping centre,, they are not of such quality to warrant a standalone article. Capitalistroadster 02:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 02:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Long been controversial for planning issues. Was the source of a political scandal in about 2003, when the relevant state government minister signed off on claims about its likely success made to potential tenants that turned out to be completely false, leaving a lot of tenants in deep trouble (I remember the television coverage at the time). Currently undergoing a major expansion. This a plenty notable shopping centre, and there's room to expand this to make for quite an interesting article. Rebecca 03:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Long been controversial for planning issues. Was the source of a political scandal in about 2003, when the relevant state government minister signed off on claims about its likely success made to potential tenants that turned out to be completely false, leaving a lot of tenants in deep trouble (I remember the television coverage at the time). Currently undergoing a major expansion. This a plenty notable shopping centre, and there's room to expand this to make for quite an interesting article. Rebecca 03:49, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Merge with Frankston, Victoria per WP:LOCAL. Currently does not meet any notability criterion on its own. --Nehwyn 11:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Frankston, Victoria per WP:LOCAL. As a suggestion, someone may want to consider doing the same for all of the articles created by Tuddy that are likely to wind up here to save listing them here. Note this is not simply a request to merge all since some of them are apparently notable.  Vegaswikian 00:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --Elonka 00:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge or delete outright. This is a textbook example of an article that fails to assert notability, regardless of whether the subject is notable or not. — Saxifrage ✎ 19:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. non-notable.  --Roisterer 13:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn, fails to assert notability. --User:Arnzy (talk· contribs) 00:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.