Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayu Indrawan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Bayu Indrawan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable academic. Page created by a temp banned user, banned for socking. It was prod'd by another editor but the prod was removed by the article author - who appears to be the person in the article. Related article created by the same person is [|up for deletion]. Article text describes a non-notable academic. The claims of notability are of being an expert on waste management, having delivered keynote speeches, and being on international leadership programs. None of these are a sufficient claim of notability. The article references are largely either self-drafted works or are descriptions of participation in events. This is not third party coverage describing a notable academic as every academic gets invited to speak at events and conferences. MLA (talk) 02:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Notability of this person is OK. Recently this person appears many times in local Indonesia television. Pedulilingkungan (talk) — Pedulilingkungan (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete - as per nomination. I PRODed it and there has been no improvement in establishing notability since the PROD was removed. There appears to be a cabal of meat or sock puppets working to maintain a couple of article here, including this one. Such activities do not have any impact on the ability to determine notability or lack of it.  Velella  Velella Talk  08:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It would take something pretty exceptional for an academic below the level of professor to pass WP:PROF, and I see no evidence of such exceptionality here. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as this is loaded with information and sources but examining it shows nothing actually convincing for any applicable notability, there's simply nothing convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  21:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.