Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baz Porter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:54, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Baz Porter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotion. No independent, reliable sources at all. Press releases and self-published websites. Vexations (talk) 11:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 11:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete possible candidate for G11 speedy deletion. Mccapra (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete somewhat promotional (not G11-level IMO but still) and wholly non-notable.  Java Hurricane  13:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi there, this article is a factual the work this man does is life changing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1303:4899:F18F:E8D3:305B:1021 (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: there is no evidence of anything that would demonstrate notability per WP:ANYBIO. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: per above comments — billinghurst  sDrewth  20:54, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 15:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the claims made in the article are not really backed up by the sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.