Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bc radio history


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete -Greg Asche (talk) 02:47, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Bc radio history
Non-notable website advert. — ceejayoz talk  17:08, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz talk [[Image:Flag of Australia.svg|24px]] 17:08, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * WP:NOT a web directory. Delete. -- Karada 17:09, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. jnothman talk 17:26, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't understand why this is being deleted. It was listed for AfD 1 minute after being created. In less than 30 minutes it has become the start of... well, BC radio history. Oddly enough. --Bookandcoffee 17:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising for a website. User:Zoe|(talk) 19:08, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep this article doesn't seem to be intended to be a website advert, its just a history article thats very poorly formatted TastemyHouse 19:18, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: It started as essentially an advert. Now, it appears to be a copyvio.  My vote remains delete, though the reason has now changed. — ceejayoz talk  [[Image:Flag of Australia.svg|24px]] 19:36, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, (cough). Yeah, that would be copyvio wouldn't it :) Delete. --Bookandcoffee 21:54, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Copyvio + the history of radio in British Columbia isn't somehow more notable than the history of radio in Ontario, Utah, Michigan, Quebec or any other state or province that doesn't have its own dedicated article on the history of radio within that particular state or province. History of radio in Canada would be fine; history of radio within an individual province is not. Delete. Bearcat 09:43, 6 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.